It is currently Thu Oct 18, 2018 6:45 am



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Ex-investigators
PostPosted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 2:10 pm 
Offline
The Ferryman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 12:31 pm
Posts: 10887
Location: Stockton-on-Tees
I often read from certain members of the uber-sceptic community that they used to be paranormal investigators, but that after years of looking and observing how other investigators misinterpret 'experiences', they have come to the conclusion that there is nothing really to find and that paranormal events just don't happen.

That is all well and good, and there is some truth in it, but what I don't like is when they imply that the rest of us poor schmucks doing investigations have some how all 'missed the point' and that with any luck we will eventually 'see the light' like they did.

Just because one person researches for years and fails to find any compelling evidence for the paranormal doesn't mean that the rest of those who have are all somehow deluded.

I must admit that during my years of active research, possible paranormal events have been few and far between, but it is my experiences years before that have convinced me that there is indeed something in the paranormal and that it still is an area very worthy of study.

_________________
Northern Ghost Investigations -
Messing around with things we don't understand since 2005


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Ex-investigators
PostPosted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 8:12 pm 
Offline
Elite Investigator
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 2:41 pm
Posts: 782
I agree, in that it is my own experiences that have given me 'food for thought' regarding the existence of anything paranormal.

I still maintain that these uber sceptics are not open minded, have taken their stance, and cannot be considered as objective in their views.

For me, to be open minded, is to consider all possibilities before reaching a reasonable conclusion. And even then, being open minded means considering any new evidence in the future, not simply reaching a conclusion and doing anything to justify said conclusion, like some people seem to do.

Its always intrigued me as to how far opinions get considered before something is considered as fact.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Theme designed by stylerbb.net © 2008
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
All times are UTC [ DST ]